Mental Health Toll From COVID-19 Isolation Affecting Kids on Reentry

After two suicidal crises during pandemic isolation, 16-year-old Zach Sampson feels stronger but worries his social skills have gone stale.

Amara Bhatia has overcome her pandemic depression but the teen feels worn down, in a state of “neutralness.” Virginia Shipp is adjusting but says returning to normal “is kind of unnormal for me.”

After relentless months of social distancing, online schooling and other restrictions, many kids are feeling the pandemic’s toll or facing new challenges navigating reentry.

A surge in teen suicide attempts and other mental health crises prompted Children’s Hospital Colorado to declare a state of emergency in late May, when emergency department and hospital inpatient beds were overrun with suicidal kids and those struggling with other psychiatric problems. Typical emergency-department waiting times for psychiatric treatment doubled in May to about 20 hours, said Jason Williams, a pediatric psychologist at the hospital in Aurora.

Other children’s hospitals are facing similar challenges.

In typical times, the activities that come as the school year ends — finals, prom, graduations, summer job-seeking — can be stressful even for the most resilient kids. But after more than a year of dealing with pandemic restrictions, many are worn down and simply don’t “have enough in the tank of resilience” to handle stresses that previously would have been manageable, Williams said.

“When the pandemic first hit, we saw a rise in severe cases in crisis evaluation,” as kids struggled with “their whole world shutting down,” said Christine Certain, a mental health counselor who works with Orlando Health’s Arnold Palmer Hospital for Children. ”Now, as we see the world opening back up … it’s asking these kids to make a huge shift again.”

At some children’s hospitals, psychiatric cases have remained high throughout the pandemic; others have seen a more recent surge.

At Wolfson Children’ Hospital in Jacksonville, Florida, behavioral unit admissions for kids in crisis aged 13 and younger have been soaring since 2020 and are on pace to reach 230 this year, more than four times higher than in 2019, said hospital psychologist Terrie Andrews. For older teens, admissions were up to five times higher than usual last year and remained elevated as of last month.

At Dayton Children’s Hospital in Ohio, admissions to the mental health unit increased by 30% from July 2020 through May, totaling almost 1,300. The hospital doubled the number of available beds to 24 and dropped the minimum age for treatment to 9 years from 12 years, said Dr. John Duby, a hospital vice president.

“The overwhelming demand for pediatric mental health services is putting an unprecedented strain on pediatric facilities, primary care, schools and community-based organizations that support kids’ well-being,” said Amy Knight, president of the Children’s Hospital Association.

Dr. Alison Tothy, medical director of the pediatric emergency department at the University of Chicago’s Comer Children’s Hospital, said her ER has seen kids in crisis daily since last year, struggling with suicidal thoughts, cutting and other self-harm behaviors, depression and aggressive outbursts. Kids are stabilized and referred elsewhere for treatment.

“Families are coming to us because we are, in some cases, the last resort. Outpatient resources are scarce,” and parents say they can’t get an appointment for two months, she said.

In Florida, waits for outpatient treatment are even longer and many therapists don’t accept kids insured through Medicaid, Andrews said.

At Children’s Hospital Colorado, emergency department visits for behavioral health problems were up 90% in April 2021 over April 2019 and remained high in May. Though the pace slowed in June, hospital authorities are concerned about another spike when school resumes.

Williams said issues the hospital is treating are “across the board,” from children with previous mental health issues that have worsened to those who never struggled before the pandemic.

Like many states, Colorado doesn’t have enough child and teen mental health therapists to meet demand, an issue even before the pandemic, Williams said.

Children who need outpatient treatment are finding it takes six to nine months for an appointment. And many therapists don’t accept health insurance, leaving struggling families with few options. Delays in treatment can lead to crises that land kids in the ER.

Those who improve after inpatient psychiatric care but aren’t well enough to go home are being sent out of state because there aren’t enough facilities in Colorado, Williams said.

Sampson says “just a lot of stuff” triggered his first crisis last August. The Jacksonville, Florida, teen struggled with online education and spent hours in his room alone playing video games and scrolling the internet, drawn to dark sites that “made my brain hurt.”

He revealed his suicidal thoughts to a friend, who called the police. He spent a week in the hospital under psychiatric care.

Both his parents have worked in mental health jobs but had no idea how he was struggling.

“We had realized he had been spending more time isolating, not really tending to showering and that type of stuff, but we were in the middle of a pandemic. No one was really doing those things,” said his mother, Jennifer Sampson.

The teen started virtual psychotherapy but in March his self-destructive thoughts resurfaced. Hospital psychiatric beds were full so he waited a week in a holding area to receive treatment, his mother recalled.

Now on mood stabilizers, he’s continuing therapist visits, has finished sophomore year and is looking forward to returning to in-person school this fall. Still, he says it’s hard motivating himself to leave the house to go to the gym or hang out with friends.

“I definitely find my social skills are rusty,” Sampson said.

“I feel that this is going to be something that we’re dealing with for quite a while,” his mother said.

That’s likely true, too, for those who haven’t reached a crisis point.

Bhatia, a 17-year-old self-described “stereotypical introvert” with clinical anxiety, also worries about returning to the classroom for senior year.

The Oakland, California, teen says the pandemic began as almost a welcome change. Being social takes effort, and isolation allowed her to recharge. Still, she had bouts of depression, got frustrated with virtual school and missed her friends.

She used to be a hugger but has become “a bit more of a germaphobe” and says the few times she’s been hugged since social distancing restrictions lifted, she froze.

The pandemic has left her worn down, “like running a marathon, and I’m finally reaching the end and I’m just getting so tired at this point.”

“I think I don’t have the energy for happiness,” she said.

For 18-year-old Shipp, also of Oakland, the pandemic hit in her senior year as she was planning a trip to Europe and anticipating college in the fall. Neither happened and she described 2020 as a year of negative thinking, stuck in her room alone with her thoughts.

“I felt depressed and anxious and very scared for the future,” she said.

As a Black woman, she wanted to join marchers protesting George Floyd’s murder but decided close contact with strangers was too risky.

She doesn’t know anyone who got very sick or died, but says she worried about COVID-19 “every single day.” Shipp used meditation to help relieve stress.

She recently got vaccinated and learned college at Cal Poly in Pomona will be in person in the fall. But she’s not sure she’s completely ready.

“It’s still a little weird because now, all of a sudden … you don’t need to wear the mask? It’s like jumping into the water too fast,” Shipp said. “The normalcy is kind of unnormal for me.”

Source: Voice of America

“Data and Technology for Climate Action” – Keynote Remarks by Mr Ravi Menon, Managing Director, Monetary Authority of Singapore, at COP26 Investor Action on Climate Webinar via Video Conference on 29 June 2021

• First, climate change is the defining crisis of our time – it is already happening, the worst is yet to come, and there is much at stake globally for lives and livelihoods.

• Second, finance has a key role to play in supporting the world’s transition to a greener and more sustainable trajectory.

• Third, to enable green finance flows and address climate related risks, we need trusted, timely, and relevant data.

I take it we are all on the same page on the fact of climate change and the role of green finance, so let me focus on issues relating to data – which is a critical foundation for the green economy architecture the world needs to build.

Financial institutions need accurate, granular data to assess and manage the environmental risks in their portfolios. What kind of data? For example:

• geographical, climate and weather-related data on their assets as well as along the supply chain;

• data on firms’ carbon footprint, historical carbon emissions, and pathways to reduce emissions over time;

• data on energy use and efficiency of physical assets, such as real estate; and

• data to monitor customers’ compliance to ESG standards and to measure the impact of transition activities on the climate.

The demand for trusted data will only grow as regulators strengthen reporting and disclosure requirements. Yet, the availability of good data remains a big challenge.

• The process of ESG data acquisition is manual, cumbersome and costly.

• There is also lack of transparency in the verification and reporting process.

Technology can be a game changer in addressing these data challenges.

First, the problem of data acquisition.

• FinTechs are offering solutions that connect directly via Application Programming Interfaces (APIs) to existing systems, such as waste management systems, to retrieve relevant environmental and energy consumption data more efficiently.

• Financial institutions are exploring the use of IoT devices and sensors to measure directly at source, carbon emissions, energy consumption, and pollution.

• Satellite imagery is being used to track the progress of reforestation and carbon sequestration projects, which enables nature-based solutions and offerings.

Second, the problem of data provenance.

• Here, distributed ledger technology is being considered as a way to maintain provenance and traceability in the data.

• For example, IBM’s Food Trust uses blockchain to connect participants across the food ecosystem, such as growers, processors and retailers, with data collected along the supply chain.

• This allows them to ensure that food safety protocols and sustainable food practices are adopted at each stage of the food chain.

• It also allows them to trace any food fraud incidents or food safety breaches back to their source.

• With greater certainty over the provenance of the data, financial institutions and corporates are better able to mitigate the risks of greenwashing.

Third, data for monitoring commitments.

• Technology solutions can help financial institutions and project owners in monitoring and meeting their commitments to ESG targets.

• FinTechs are providing financial institutions with good data and analytics to assess and benchmark ESG performance against peer companies.

• Intensel, a winner of the MAS Global FinTech Hackcelerator last year, uses artificial intelligence to analyse climate data and satellite imagery and assess the physical risks faced by assets to floods, typhoons, storm surges, and extreme heat.

Fourth, data for reporting.

• FinTechs are offering tools to automate the reporting process, while being nimble enough to adapt to various standards, such as the Sustainable Accounting Standards Board (SASB) and the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI).

• Matter Analytics, another winning solution at last year’s MAS FinTech Hackcelerator, offers reporting solutions that help asset managers, asset owners and banks automatically generate customised and comprehensive impact reports for their clients.

The technologies are promising, but that is not to say there are no challenges in this space.

First, the ESG landscape continues to evolve.

• Taxonomies are still being defined and harmonised. These are important efforts that will take some time.

• Disclosures and reporting requirements are also being formulated by governments and regulators.

But financial institutions cannot adopt a wait-and-see approach.

• They should not look at ESG only from the lens of regulatory requirements.

• Climate risk is a real threat: financial institutions should have the conviction to want to understand the environmental risks in their portfolios and to mitigate these risks.

• It is imperative that financial institutions step up efforts to collect the data that are necessary to mitigate their physical and transition risks as soon as possible.

Second, financial institutions need greater clarity on the ESG data they need.

• The Network for Greening the Financial System (NGFS) has recently published a progress report on bridging data gaps.

• MAS agrees with the recommended approach, which is to first identify the stakeholders and use cases, and then define the metrics and data requirements.

• In the absence of a use case driven approach, technology will remain a solution looking for a problem to solve.

In Singapore, MAS is working with our financial institutions, solutions and data partners to pilot some use cases so that we can collectively learn, adapt, and grow in our ability to define the right metrics for ESG measurement.

MAS has launched, together with the industry, Project Greenprint – a technology platform to support the green finance ecosystem.

• The project will identify use cases where technology can help to mobilise capital for green projects, monitor commitments to emissions reductions, and quantify the impact of abatement efforts.

• We look forward to collaborating with more international financial institutions and solution providers in this effort.

Third, we need to develop methodologies to translate raw data into quantifiable assessments of climate-related risks.

• As the data to be collected and metrics that are relevant for each sector can differ greatly, there will be a need to take a sectoral approach to this.

• For example, an asset manager looking to invest in the agriculture sector will not find raw data such as temperature and rainfall levels, proximity of the farmland to conservation areas, or the education levels of the farm owners meaningful.

• These must be converted into an accurate assessment of the environmental and credit risks of the agricultural assets so that the asset manager can adjust its investment decisions accordingly.

The financial sector has an important role to play in determining these frameworks, to ensure that capital is channelled effectively towards sustainable business practices.

MAS is keen to work with the industry, academia and international organisations to develop these sector-specific frameworks, for example, for maritime, agriculture, logistics, and others.

As an international financial centre, Singapore is committed to channelling financial flows towards sustainability and transition efforts in Asia and globally.

• We are developing green finance solutions and markets that can support a sustainable economy.

• We are strengthening the financial sector’s resilience to environmental risks through providing guidelines on environmental risk management and stepping up disclosure expectations.

• We are working closely with the private sector to develop a taxonomy prioritising transition activities.

• We are actively exploring how technology and innovation can be leveraged to drive the financial sector’s sustainability agenda.

We must harness technology and data to drive effective climate action. The transition to a net-zero economy can only be achieved with a committed and concerted effort across the public and private sector.

I wish all of you a fruitful discussion ahead.

Source: Monetary Authority of Singapore

Minister for Foreign Affairs Dr Vivian Balakrishnan’s Participation in the Ministerial Meeting of the Global Coalition to Defeat ISIS in Rome, Italy on 28 June 2021

Minister for Foreign Affairs Dr Vivian Balakrishnan attended the Ministerial Meeting of the Global Coalition to Defeat ISIS in Rome, co-chaired by Minister of Foreign Affairs and International Cooperation of the Italian Republic Luigi di Maio and Secretary of State of the United States Antony Blinken, on 28 June 2021.

At the meeting, Minister Balakrishnan reaffirmed Singapore’s support for the Coalition’s efforts to ensure the enduring defeat of ISIS globally and prevent attacks from returning foreign terrorist fighters. Notwithstanding ISIS’s territorial defeat in Iraq and Syria, ISIS retains a diffused global presence, exploiting the digital sphere to extend its networks and propagate extremism. Vigilance is therefore still needed.

Singapore remains committed to global and regional efforts to prevent and counter the rise of radicalisation and violent extremism. Minister Balakrishnan highlighted Singapore’s efforts to counter terrorism through close community engagement and domestic security response preparedness, as well as enhance international intelligence sharing through the establishment of the Counter-Terrorism Information Facility in Singapore. The full text of Minister Balakrishnan’s remarks is appended.

Minister Balakrishnan also met a number of counterparts on the sidelines of the conference, and had bilateral meetings withMinister of Foreign Affairs of the Hellenic Republic Nikos Dendias and Minister of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Turkey Mevlüt Çavusoglu.

Source: Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Government of Singapore

Oil drops as COVID-19 surges threaten fuel demand outlook

Oil prices dropped for a second day on Tuesday on worries about slower fuel demand growth as outbreaks of the highly contagious COVID-19 variant Delta sparked new mobility restrictions around the world, Trend reports with reference to Reuters.

Brent crude futures fell 35 cents, or 0.5%, to $74.33 a barrel by 0706 GMT, after slumping 2% on Monday.

U.S. West Texas Intermediate (WTI) crude futures fell 34 cents, or 0.5%, to $72.57 a barrel, extending a 1.5% loss on Monday.

The flare-up in cases of the Delta variant comes as the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC), Russia and allies, together known as OPEC+, are set to meet on July 1 to discuss easing their supply curbs.

OPEC’s demand forecasts show that in the fourth quarter global oil supply will fall short of demand by 2.2 million barrels per day (bpd), giving the producers some room to agree to add output.

“We expect the cartel to release 250 (thousand barrels per day) of supply curbs from August onwards. Failure to turn on the taps further may see Brent top $80 (a barrel) by next month,” said Howie Lee, economist at OCBC Treasury Research in Singapore.

Spain and Portugal, favourite summer holiday destinations for Europeans, imposed new restrictions on unvaccinated Britons on Monday, while 80% of Australians faced tighter curbs due to flare-ups of the virus across the country.

Talks on a travel corridor between the United States and Britain also slowed, partly on concerns about a rise in cases of the Delta variant in Britain, the Financial Times reported, citing officials.

Analysts expect OPEC+ to step up supply by about 500,000 bpd in August, as the market has tightened on strong growth in fuel demand in the United States and China, the world’s two biggest oil consumers.

Investors will be looking to the latest U.S. inventory data to reinforce that view, with analysts expecting crude stocks to extend their fall for a sixth straight week, while gasoline stocks also declined, a preliminary Reuters poll showed.

Seven analysts estimated, on average, that U.S. crude stocks fell by about 4.5 million barrels in the week to June 25, in a poll conducted ahead of reports from the American Petroleum Institute, an industry group, on Tuesday and the Energy Information Administration (EIA), on Wednesday.

Source: TREND News Agency

Iranian currency rates for June 29

The Central Bank of Iran (CBI) has announced the official rate of foreign currencies on June 29, Trend reports referring to CBI.

According to the currency exchange rate of the Central Bank of Iran, 15 currencies have increased and 24 have decreased compared to June 28.

According to CBI, $1 equals 42,000 Iranian rials and 1 euro equals 50,123 rials.

Currency Iranian rial on June 29 Iranian rial on June 28

1 US dollar USD 42,000 42,000

1 British pound GBP 58,356 58,292

1 Swiss franc CHF 45,718 45,769

1 Swedish krona SEK 4,936 4,953

1 Norwegian krone NOK 4,929 4,951

1 Danish krone DKK 6,741 6,742

1 Indian rupee INR 566 567

1 UAE dirham AED 11,437 11,437

1 Kuwaiti dinar KWD 139,502 139,214

100 Pakistani rupees PKR 26,583 26,670

100 Japanese yens JPY 38,000 37,908

1 Hong Kong dollar HKD 5,411 5,412

1 Omani rial OMR 109,234 109,233

1 Canadian dollar CAD 34,075 34,162

1 New Zealand dollar NZD 29,618 29,706

1 South African rand ZAR 2,956 2,969

1 Turkish lira TRY 4,833 4,802

1 Russian ruble RUB 582 583

1 Qatari riyal QAR 11,539 11,539

100 Iraq dinars IQD 2,879 2,878

1 Syrian pound SYP 34 34

1 Australian dollar AUD 31,805 31,865

1 Saudi riyal SAR 11,201 11,200

1 Bahraini dinar BHD 111,703 111,701

1 Singapore dollar SGD 31,290 31,288

100 Bangladeshi takas BDT 49,517 49,485

10 Sri Lankan rupees LKR 2,110 2,111

1 Myanmar kyat MMK 26 26

100 Nepalese rupees NPR 35,158 35,226

1 Libyan dinar LYD 9,325 9,346

1 Chinese yuan CNY 6,506 6,507

100 Thai baths THB 131,565 131,932

1 Malaysian ringgit MYR 10,130 10,105

1,000 South Korean wons KRW 37,154 37,255

1 Jordanian dinar JOD 59,239 59,239

1 euro EUR 50,123 50,128

100 Kazakh tenge KZT 9,844 9,842

1 Georgian lari GEL 13,316 13,347

1,000 Indonesian rupiahs IDR 2,903 2,907

1 Afghan afghani AFN 530 536

1 Belarus ruble BYN 16,663 16,635

1 Azerbaijani manat AZN 24,722 24,706

100 Philippine pesos PHP 86,368 86,480

1 Tajik somoni TJS 3,684 3,710

1 Turkmen manat TMT 12,020 11,966

In Iran, the official exchange rate is used for the import of some essential products.

SANA system is a system introduced by the Central Bank of Iran to the currency exchange offices, where the price of 1 euro is 286,878 rials, and the price of $1 is 240,387 rials.

NIMA is a system intended for the sale of a certain percentage of the foreign currency gained from export. The price of 1 euro in this system is 257,758 rials, and the price of $1 is 215,986 rials.

In the black market, $1 is worth about 241,000-244,000 rials, while 1 euro is worth about 285,000-288,000 rials.

Source: TREND News Agency

Azerbaijani currency rates for June 29

The official exchange rate of the US dollar and euro against Azerbaijani manat was set at 1.7 manat and 2.0252 manat respectively for June 29.

Below are the rates of Azerbaijani manat against world currencies according to the data from the Central Bank of Azerbaijan.

Currencies June 29, 2021 June 25, 2021 May 29, 2021 June 29, 2020 Daily difference Monthly difference Annual difference

1 US dollar 1 USD 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 0 0 0

1 euro 1 EUR 2.0252 2.0296 2.0729 1.9114 -0.0044 -0.0477 0.1138

1 Australian dollar 1 AUD 1.2843 1.2904 1.3159 1.1687 -0.0061 -0.0316 0.1156

1 Argentine peso 1 ARS 0.0178 0.0178 0.018 0.0242 0 -0.0002 -0.0064

100 Belarus rubles 1 BYN 0.6733 0.6719 0.6768 0.7121 0.0014 -0.0035 -0.0388

1 Brazil real 1 BRL 0.3451 0.3459 0.32 0.31 -0.0008 0.0251 0.0351

1 UAE dirham 1 AED 0.4628 0.4628 0.4628 0.4628 0 0 0

1 South African rand 1 ZAR 0.1191 0.1199 0.1235 0.0982 -0.0008 -0.0044 0.0209

100 South Korean won 100 KRW 0.1505 0.1506 0.1521 0.1416 -0.0001 -0.0016 0.0089

1 Czech koruna 1 CZK 0.0797 0.0798 0.0815 0.0714 -0.0001 -0.0018 0.0083

1 Chilean peso 100 CLP 0.2317 0.2314 0.233 0.2078 0.0003 -0.0013 0.0239

1 Chinese yuan 1 CNY 0.2631 0.263 0.2662 0.2402 0.0001 -0.0031 0.0229

1 Danish krone 1 DKK 0.2723 0.2729 0.2788 0.2565 -0.0006 -0.0065 0.0158

1 Georgian lari 1 GEL 0.5387 0.5404 0.5205 0.5561 -0.0017 0.0182 -0.0174

1 Hong Kong dollar 1 HKD 0.219 0.219 0.219 0.2193 0 0 -0.0003

1 Indian rupee 1 INR 0.0229 0.0229 0.0234 0.0225 0 -0.0005 0.0004

1 British pound 1 GBP 2.3573 2.3669 2.4 2.1026 -0.0096 -0.0427 0.2547

100 Indonesian rupiah 100 IDR 0.0117 0.0118 0.0119 0.0119 -0.0001 -0.0002 -0.0002

100 Iranian rials 100 IRR 0.004 0.004 0.004 0.004 0 0 0

1 Swedish krona 1 SEK 0.1995 0.2006 0.2045 0.1827 -0.0011 -0.005 0.0168

1 Swiss franc 1 CHF 1.8471 1.8528 1.8949 1.795 -0.0057 -0.0478 0.0521

1 Israeli shekel 1 ILS 0.5218 0.5245 0.5234 0.4958 -0.0027 -0.0016 0.026

1 Canadian dollar 1 CAD 1.3771 1.3805 1.4024 1.2441 -0.0034 -0.0253 0.133

1 Kuwaiti dinar 1 KWD 5.6462 5.6476 5.6561 5.5246 -0.0014 -0.0099 0.1216

1 Kazakh tenge 1 KZT 0.004 0.004 0.004 0.0042 0 0 -0.0002

1 Kyrgyz som 1 KGS 0.0201 0.0201 0.0204 0.0225 0 -0.0003 -0.0024

100 Lebanese pounds 100 LBP 0.1119 0.1124 0.1125 0.1125 -0.0005 -0.0006 -0.0006

1 Malaysian ringgit 1 MYR 0.4097 0.4086 0.4104 0.3966 0.0011 -0.0007 0.0131

1 Mexican peso 1 MXP 0.0857 0.0855 0.0855 0.0738 0.0002 0.0002 0.0119

1 Moldovan leu 1 MDL 0.0945 0.0944 0.0966 0.0988 0.0001 -0.0021 -0.0043

1 Egyptian pound 1 EGP 0.1085 0.1084 0.1085 0.1052 0.0001 0 0.0033

1 Norwegian krone 1 NOK 0.1989 0.2002 0.2029 0.1754 -0.0013 -0.004 0.0235

100 Uzbek soums 100 UZS 0.0161 0.0161 0.016 0.0167 0 0.0001 -0.0006

1 Polish zloty 1 PLN 0.4499 0.449 0.4605 0.4277 0.0009 -0.0106 0.0222

1 Russian ruble 1 RUB 0.0235 0.0235 0.0231 0.0243 0 0.0004 -0.0008

1 Singapore dollar 1 SGD 1.2654 1.2666 1.2837 1.22 -0.0012 -0.0183 0.0454

1 Saudi riyal 1 SAR 0.4533 0.4533 0.4533 0.4532 0 0 0.0001

1 SDR (Special Drawing Rights of IMF) 1 SDR 2.4286 2.4291 2.4589 2.3411 -0.0005 -0.0303 0.0875

1 Turkish lira 1 TRY 0.1956 0.1953 0.2009 0.248 0.0003 -0.0053 -0.0524

1 Taiwan dollar 1 TWD 0.0607 0.0609 0.0611 0.0576 -0.0002 -0.0004 0.0031

1 Tajik somoni 1 TJS 0.1504 0.1503 0.1503 0.1649 0.0001 0.0001 -0.0145

1 New Turkmen manat 1 TMM 0.4857 0.4857 0.4857 0.4857 0 0 0

1 Ukrainian hryvna 1 UAH 0.0622 0.0617 0.0618 0.0637 0.0005 0.0004 -0.0015

100 Japanese yen 100 JPY 1.5377 1.5339 1.5586 1.5874 0.0038 -0.0209 -0.0497

1 New Zealand dollar 1 NZD 1.195 1.2025 1.2392 1.0928 -0.0075 -0.0442

Source: TREND News Agency

More than 2,000 people from Azerbaijan visited Uzbekistan in 2020

The number of people who traveled to Uzbekistan from Azerbaijan in 2020 amounted to 2,200, while the number of Uzbek citizens who traveled to Azerbaijan accounted for 1,400, Trend reports referring to the State Statistics Committee of Uzbekistan.

According to the committee, the number of citizens of Uzbekistan who left the country for the CIS countries in 2020 amounted to 1.8 million people, to other foreign countries – 158,200 people. It is noted that 84.7 percent left for the purpose of visiting relatives, 7.9 percent – for recreation and leisure, 5.4 percent – for studies, 1.2 percent – for work needs, and 0.8 percent – for treatment.

At the same time, the number of foreign citizens who arrived in Uzbekistan from the CIS in 2020 amounted to 1.4 million people, or 94.4 percent, from non-CIS countries – 83,800 people, or 5.6 percent.

It is noted that the goal of the largest part of foreign citizens who entered Uzbekistan in 2020 is to visit relatives (87.8 percent). The smallest share of foreign citizens who entered is for recreation and leisure – 8.6 percent, treatment – 1 percent, work needs – 1.2 percent, commercial travel – 1.1 percent, and study – 0.3 percent.

It is reported that the largest flow of foreign citizens to Uzbekistan was noted from Kyrgyzstan – 508,000 people (33.8 percent), Kazakhstan – 424,100 people (28.2 percent), Tajikistan – 337,500 people (22.4 percent), Russia – 81,600 people (5.4 percent), Turkmenistan – 60,600 people (4 percent), Azerbaijan – 2,200 people (0.1 percent) and Belarus – 1,600 people (0.1 percent).

The main outflow of citizens of Uzbekistan was noted in Kyrgyzstan – 47.4 percent (947,700 people), Kazakhstan – 26 percent (520,300 people), Tajikistan – 15 percent (299,500 people), Russia – 2.7 percent (53,200 people), Turkmenistan – 0.8 percent (16,600 people), Belarus – 0.2 percent (3,700 people) and Azerbaijan – 0.1 percent (1,400 people).

Moreover, the largest outflow of people from Uzbekistan to foreign countries accounted for Turkey (62,700 people), the United Arab Emirates (29,500 people), Saudi Arabia (27,800 people), South Korea (9,800 people), India (5,400 people), Egypt (4,900 people), Thailand (4,700 people), the US (3,100 people), Germany (1,700 people) and Singapore (1,300 people).

Source: TREND News Agency